MIG Welding Problems Chart: Causes, Fixes & Prevention
Table of Contents
It’s 9 p.m., you’ve got a cracked trailer fender clamped up, and the bead coming out looks like a caterpillared mess of holes and flying sparks. You check the chart taped to the wall, turn one knob, and somehow it gets worse. A MIG problems chart only works if you know which variable to change first, and why.
MIG Welding Problems Chart: How to Diagnose a Bad Weld Without Guessing
It’s 9 p.m., the trailer fender is clamped in place, and the bead you just laid down looks less like a weld and more like a caterpillar with a bad cold. Porosity, spatter, and a wire birdnest all showed up in the same pass. You turn to the MIG welding problems chart taped above the bench, change one knob, and the next bead is worse. That is the trap: a chart can point you toward an answer, but it cannot reason for you.
Here is the short answer. A MIG welding problems chart is a lookup table that maps a visible symptom, such as porosity, spatter, undercut, burn-through, birdnesting, a convex bead, or a wandering arc, to the most likely causes and the specific adjustment that usually fixes each one. It is a fast way to narrow the field when you are tired and the clock is running.
The catch is overlap. Most MIG defects have three or four possible causes, and several can be present at once. Porosity might come from an empty cylinder, a clogged nozzle, a draft, dirty steel, or the wrong filler. Spatter might be a voltage mismatch, too much gas flow, mill scale, a worn contact tip, or a loose ground. Hobart Brothers notes that most common MIG issues, including porosity, undercut, spatter, and lack of fusion, can often be resolved with simple changes to joint design, technique, or parameter settings. The word “simple” hides the real work: identifying which change applies to your weld.
That is why this article treats the chart as a hypothesis generator, not a magic answer key. You form a short list of suspects, test them one at a time, and let the weld tell you what changed.
The Four Families of MIG Problems
Every symptom in this guide belongs to one of four families. Grouping them this way keeps you from twisting random knobs.
- Gas and contamination: porosity, soot, and poor fusion caused by oil, paint, rust, galvanizing, moisture, or lost shielding.
- Electrical settings: voltage, wire feed speed, inductance or arc control, polarity, and the metal transfer mode they create.
- Wire delivery: birdnesting, burnback, stubbing, chattering, liner drag, drive-roll tension, and contact-tip wear.
- Technique and geometry: travel speed, stickout, gun angle, joint fit-up, position, and heat input.
If a bead is porous, start with gas and contamination. If it is spattery and harsh, start with electrical settings. If the wire stops feeding or the arc stutters, start with delivery. If the bead shape is wrong but the arc sounds steady, start with technique. The rest of this article follows that order, then brings everything together in a repeatable diagnostic sequence.
MIG welding is properly called gas metal arc welding, or GMAW. A continuously fed wire electrode meets the work while an externally supplied shielding gas protects the molten puddle. The same troubleshooting logic applies to solid wire, metal-cored, and flux-cored wires, but the polarity and gas rules change. Self-shielded flux-cored wire, for example, runs on DCEN and needs no external gas, so a gas-focused checklist will send you down the wrong path. For a closer look at wire-feed behavior in a softer metal, our aluminum MIG welding guide is a useful companion.
If you are still dialing in your machine, a beginner MIG setup guide will save you hours, and a MIG vs flux-cored comparison will help you choose the right process before you troubleshoot it. Start with a stable, clean setup, then use the chart.
Quick Note: Change one variable at a time and weld a test coupon after each change. If you adjust gas flow, voltage, and stickout in the same pass, you will never know which one fixed the weld, or which one made it worse.
In the next section, we build the mental model behind the chart: the five variables that control almost every MIG weld. Once you understand those, a chart row becomes a place to test an idea rather than a guess.
How to Read Your Weld: The Five Variables Behind Almost Every MIG Problem
Before a MIG welding problems chart means anything, you need a mental model of what the machine is doing. Charts fail beginners because they jump to symptoms without explaining how the settings interact. Nearly every defect traces back to five variables. Learn those, and the chart becomes a set of instructions instead of a guessing game.
The Five Variables You Control
1. Voltage (arc length). Sets arc length and puddle width. More voltage gives a longer arc, a flatter bead, and wider heat spread; too much and you undercut or burn through.
2. Wire feed speed (current and deposition). Controls how much filler arrives per second, which becomes amperage. More wire means more metal going in, faster.
3. Travel speed and gun angle. Travel speed changes heat input per inch. Gun angle changes where arc force lands and whether you push gas ahead of the puddle or drag across it.
4. Shielding gas type and flow. Gas chemistry shapes the arc and transfer mode; flow rate decides whether the weld is really protected.
5. Consumable and workpiece condition. Contact tip, liner, wire surface, base metal cleanliness, polarity. Most welders skip this one, and it is most often the culprit.
The Two-Knob Problem: Voltage vs. Wire Feed Speed
Voltage and WFS are not independent. Voltage sets arc length; WFS sets current and deposition rate. Set one without the other and you land in one of two ugly states.
- Stubbing (too cold): WFS is too high for the voltage, so the wire rams the puddle before it melts. You hear a popping stutter and the gun pushes back at your hand.
- Long-arcing (too hot): Voltage is high and WFS is low, so the arc stretches. You get a hissing crackle, wide wandering spatter, and a flat or concave bead.
Dial them together: raise voltage slightly, then raise WFS to match, running a short bead each time. Lincoln Electric’s MIG problems and remedies guide treats that pairing as the foundation of every adjustment.
Quick Note: One knob at a time, then a test bead. Change both and the weld may improve, but you will not know which change did it.
Metal Transfer Modes: Where Spatter Is Born
On steel, metal transfers in three modes, and the mode matters more than most charts admit.
| Mode | What Happens | Typical Character |
|---|---|---|
| Short circuit | Wire touches the puddle, pinches off, repeats | Low heat, thin metal, more spatter, buzzing |
| Globular | Large irregular droplets cross a long arc | Unstable, heavy spatter, poor bead shape |
| Spray | Fine droplets stream across a stable arc | High heat, argon-rich gas, smooth and quiet |
Globular is the transition between short circuit and spray, and it is spatter’s favorite neighborhood. Unstable transfer is the usual root of excessive spatter, so if your settings sit in that band, technique will not save the bead. Aluminum behaves differently enough to deserve separate study — our aluminum MIG welding guide covers it.
Duty Cycle: An Operating Limit, Not a Defect
Duty cycle is the percentage of a ten-minute period a machine can weld at a given amperage before cooling: 60% at 200 amps means six minutes welding, four minutes rest. A thermal trip is not a defect; you have simply exceeded an operating limit. Let the fan work, then ask whether the job really needs that much amperage, because a smaller wire or different joint prep may keep you inside the rating.
The Diagnostic Sequence
Work this order every time, before you touch settings that worked last week.
- Verify gas: cylinder level, valve open, flowmeter reading, nozzle clear, no drafts.
- Verify ground and polarity: clean bare metal, tight clamp, correct leads for the wire.
- Verify wire delivery: spool, drive roll tension, liner, contact tip.
- Set parameters on scrap: start from a chart, then tune on a coupon of the same thickness.
- Adjust technique last: angle, travel speed, stickout.
Setup faults masquerade as technique faults: a bad ground makes an arc that looks exactly like a gas problem. ESAB’s guide to resolving common MIG defects makes the same point — eliminate the system first, then refine the hand.
What You See vs. What It Usually Means
| What You See | What It Usually Means | Where to Look First | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porosity (holes in the bead) | Lost or contaminated gas | Gas system, then base metal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Heavy spatter | Unstable transfer, wrong voltage for WFS | Settings, then ground and stickout | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stubbing, gun pushing back | WFS too high for voltage | Raise voltage or lower WFS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long hissing arc, flat bead | Voltage too high for WFS | Lower voltage or raise WFS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Undercut at the toes | Excess voltage, fast travel, wrong angle | Voltage, then travel speed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Burn-through on thin sheet | Too much heat, slow travel | Lower WFS, faster travel, smaller wire | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Birdnest at the drive rolls | Feed restriction or wrong tension | Liner, tip, drive roll groove | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High crowned
Porosity: Why Your MIG Weld Looks Like Swiss CheeseYou drag the wire brush across a fresh bead and your stomach drops. Instead of a smooth silver crown, the surface is pocked with tiny craters, like someone went at the weld with a needle. That’s porosity, and it’s the most searched MIG defect for a reason: it shows up fast, it looks terrible, and it can mean the joint is genuinely weak. Porosity is trapped gas. As the puddle solidifies, gas dissolved in the molten metal — or swept in from the arc atmosphere — doesn’t have time to escape before the metal freezes, so it leaves cavities behind. Some break the surface where you can see them. Others sit under a thin skin of sound metal and only appear when you grind, bend, or X-ray the joint. That second kind is the one that should worry you. Three Sources of Gas, One DiagnosisEvery porosity problem traces back to one of three gas sources. Figure out which one you’re dealing with and the fix narrows dramatically.
Aluminum makes this worse because its surface oxide layer absorbs moisture eagerly, so prep matters more. Our guide to aluminum cleaner for welding covers the degreasing and oxide removal steps that prevent this specific failure. The Systematic Gas Check, In Order of LikelihoodDon’t start by tearing apart your machine. Work down this list, because the boring answers are usually the right ones.
One more item worth knowing: Lincoln Electric notes that an oversized contact tip causes arc inconsistency, porosity, and poor bead shape. Match the tip to your wire diameter exactly. For a deeper look at matching gas to process, our aluminum MIG welding guide walks through argon and helium blends in detail — the same selection logic applies to steel, just with different mixes. Short Note: Never diagnose porosity by eye alone on structural work. Surface pinholes are only the visible fraction. Subsurface porosity can pass a visual inspection and still reduce the effective throat of the weld. If the joint is load-bearing, pressure-retaining, or code-governed, it needs the inspection method your procedure calls for — not a wire brush and a guess. The Filler Metal Chemistry AngleHere’s the part most charts skip. Your wire is a deoxidizer, and some wires deoxidize better than others. Lincoln Electric notes that ER70S-3 contains about 0.45–0.75% silicon and 0.9–1.4% manganese, while ER70S-6 carries roughly 0.8–1.15% silicon and 1.4–1.8% manganese. Those extra points of silicon and manganese are scavengers. They combine with oxygen in the puddle and float the resulting oxides out as slag, leaving cleaner metal behind. On dirty, rusty, mill-scale-heavy steel — or when you’re on the edge of your gas coverage — ER70S-6 buys tolerance that ER70S-3 doesn’t. On clean, well-shielded plate the difference is subtle. On real-world material, it’s often the fix. Porosity in Specific LocationsWhere the holes appear tells you what’s wrong.
The start-of-bead pattern catches people constantly. Gas surges when the solenoid opens, briefly over-pressurizing the line before it settles, so the first half-inch gets a chaotic shield. Half a second of pre-flow eliminates it. The end-of-bead pattern is simply losing coverage as you lift the gun; hold your position for a beat and let the crater fill. One last check: a loose, painted, or rusty ground clamp produces an erratic arc that mimics gas trouble. Clean metal, clamped close to the work, every time. Welders who blame their technique for weeks often find the answer under the clamp. And if you’re on aluminum and suspect the process itself is the problem, aluminum flux welding explains when a different route makes more sense than fighting gas coverage on thin sheet. The diagnostic sequence stays the same either way: verify gas, verify ground, verify the wire path, then adjust technique. Excessive Spatter and an Unstable Arc: Fixing the Mess Before It CoolsSpatter is molten metal that leaves the transfer stream and never joins the puddle. The droplets cool in flight, land on your plate, your table, and your forearms, and stay there. Every MIG arc throws a few, so a light dusting is normal. The real signal is in the volume and the shape. A fine, even sprinkle that brushes off with a gloved hand means the process is roughly healthy. A halo of bb-sized balls, a bead with torn edges, and a nozzle caked in metal after four inches of weld means the arc is unstable and something upstream is feeding it bad information. JASIC’s troubleshooting guide makes the key point well: excessive spatter is a symptom of an unstable arc or unstable metal transfer, usually from mismatched voltage and current, wire feed trouble, or a dirty surface. That reframes the problem. You are not fighting spatter. You are chasing the instability that produces it. The Four Families of Spatter CausesElectrical. Voltage that doesn’t match wire feed speed is the number one offender. Too low and the wire stubs into the plate, the arc shortens, and droplets blow out sideways. Too high and the arc wanders and metal sprays. Settings trapped in the globular transition zone produce the ugliest spatter, because molten balls bigger than the arc can control drop through it. Wrong inductance or arc-control settings on short circuit make it worse by changing how abruptly the current rises. Gas-related. Too little flow leaves the puddle exposed. But ESAB notes that too much flow contributes to spatter too, because a high-velocity stream turns turbulent and drags air into the shielding envelope. An open shop door or a fan pointed at your bench does the same thing from a different direction. Material-related. Mill scale, rust, oil, paint, and galvanized coating interrupt arc stability as they burn or vaporize. MillerWelds also flags contaminated or rusty wire itself, including residual drawing lubricant on a fresh spool, which is why wire storage matters as much as plate prep. Mechanical. Excessive stickout is on Miller’s list for good reason: every extra fraction of an inch of wire outside the tip raises resistance, drops voltage at the arc, and destabilizes transfer. Add the wrong contact tip size or recess, a worn or egged-out tip, and a loose ground clamp, and you get an arc that changes character mid-bead. Quick Note: Grinding spatter off hides the evidence, it doesn’t fix the arc. Sand the plate clean, run three more inches with the same settings, and watch what happens. If the mess returns, the problem is still in the machine, the gas, or the feed path, and now you have an unstable weld under a nice-looking surface. Spatter Triage in Five Moves
Push Versus Drag, and What Each Does to SpatterPushing, tilting the gun so it leads the puddle by about 10 to 15 degrees, throws spatter backward away from the puddle and gives you a clearer view of the arc. On thin sheet and aluminum, push is usually the better habit; the complete guide to aluminum MIG welding covers why heat control makes that angle almost mandatory there. Dragging, with the gun tilted back, concentrates heat, gives deeper penetration on thicker steel, and pushes spatter ahead of the arc where it can’t contaminate solidifying metal. Neither angle eliminates spatter on its own. Both keep the arc stable and consistent, which is the actual goal. Anti-Spatter: Useful, With a CatchAerosol anti-spatter works and it’s fast. Water-based versions cost less per weld and don’t carry the solvent load into your shop air. Both leave a film, though. Overspray that drifts into the puddle can cause porosity, and residue inside a joint will wreck paint adhesion later, a real problem on anything headed to a powder coater. Spray the nozzle and surrounding plate, not the joint itself, and wipe the weld zone before the next pass. When the Wire Is Flux-CoredFlux-cored and metal-cored wires follow the same logic with one twist. MillerWelds advises that low voltage can produce excessive spatter with both types, and that increasing voltage as needed brings it back under control, the opposite direction from what many solid-wire welders assume. For self-shielded flux-cored wire, the same source recommends straight polarity (electrode negative) and a drag technique. Get the polarity wrong and no amount of knob-twisting will clean it up. One last note on prep: if you’re welding aluminum and the spatter looks like popcorn, the surface is probably fighting you. Prepping aluminum properly, degreasing first and then removing the oxide layer, removes more arc instability than any setting change. Undercut, Burn-Through, Lack of Fusion, and Other Structural DefectsEverything up to this point has mostly been annoying or ugly. This section is different. The defects below decide whether a part holds, fatigues, or fails, and several of them are invisible from the outside. Each one still leaves a signature: a look, a parameter cause, a technique cause, and a specific fix. Work backwards from that. Michigan Tech’s welding discontinuities training material groups spatter, porosity, cold roll, undercut, lack of fusion, arc strikes, inclusions, and cracking as the core discontinuity categories, which is a useful reminder that “bad weld” is really a family of separate problems with separate answers. Undercut: The Groove You Never RefilledUndercut is a groove melted into the base metal at the weld toe that the puddle never filled back in. It shows up as a dark trench or shadow line running parallel to the bead, most often on the upper toe of a vertical or horizontal fillet.
Note: Running a quick cosmetic pass over undercut without fixing the cause just buries a notch under fresh metal. The stress riser is still there, now with a second heat cycle on top of it. Burn-Through: When the Root DisappearsBurn-through is complete melt-through of the root — a hole, a hanging icicle of metal, or a sagging blob on the back side. It’s a heat-input problem before it’s anything else.
Lack of Fusion and Incomplete PenetrationLack of fusion is a failure to bond to the sidewall, the root, or a previous pass. Incomplete penetration means the arc never reached the root at all. Both look fine from above: a smooth, well-shaped bead hiding a cold joint underneath. ESAB describes lack of fusion as a planar defect that acts as a stress concentrator and often escapes visual inspection, requiring ultrasonic testing to find on critical work. That planar geometry is why lack of fusion is more dangerous than porosity. Porosity is rounded and volumetric; a crack-like plane concentrates stress at its tip and can propagate under cyclic load. Causes stack up fast: too cold a setting, travel too fast for the puddle to wet the sidewall, wrong electrode angle, mill scale or oil in the joint, short-circuit transfer with insufficient heat input, and weld prep that leaves a gap the arc simply can’t reach. On aluminum, the oxide layer raises the melting point and makes cold lap even easier — the prep advice in this aluminum cleaner for welding guide applies directly. Overlap, Cracking, and Arc StrikesOverlap (cold roll) is filler metal that rolls over the base metal without fusing to it — a rounded lip at the toe with a visible line underneath. It’s a cold, fast-travel defect, usually combined with a drag angle that pushes metal ahead of the arc. Cracking comes in crater, longitudinal, and hydrogen-assisted varieties. Crater cracks form at termination when the puddle shrinks and no fill was added; hydrogen-assisted cracking shows up hours later, driven by moisture, oil, or rusty wire feeding hydrogen into the arc. Arc strikes are their own category: a momentary strike outside the weld zone creates a quench-hardened spot that can initiate cracking later. What “Acceptable” Actually Means: AWS D1.1 Visual LimitsAWS D1.1/D1.1M:2025 is the 25th edition, released in April 2025, and covers structural steel at least 1/8 inch thick with yield strength up to 100 ksi. Its visual criteria are the benchmark most North American structural work is judged against.
Two cautions. First, these limits shift with joint type, thickness, and stress category, so the table above is orientation, not a ruling. Second, your project’s WPS and the inspector’s reading of the applicable code govern — a chart cannot pass or fail a weld. For a broader walkthrough of how these imperfections are classified, TWI’s review of geometric shape imperfections and Lincoln Electric’s MIG problems and remedies guide are worth keeping on the bench. When these defects show up on aluminum rather than steel, the same logic applies but heat input and cleaning matter even more — see the complete aluminum MIG welding guide. Wire Feed Problems: Birdnesting, Burnback, Stubbing, and Chattering GunsMost MIG troubleshooting happens at the arc, but a surprising share of bad welds starts three feet behind it, inside the drive rolls and liner. The feed system is the part of the machine nobody services until it fails, and yet it controls whether the arc ever sees a steady stream of wire. When the feed is inconsistent, every other setting on the front panel becomes a guess. That’s why Lincoln Electric ties faulty wire delivery — especially an oversized contact tip — directly to arc inconsistency, porosity, and poor bead shape. Birdnesting: When the Wire Tangles at the RollsA birdnest is exactly what it sounds like: a coiled snarl of wire erupting between the drive rolls and the gun. The wire stopped moving forward, but the rolls kept pushing, so it buckled sideways.
Aluminum makes this worse because the wire is soft and has almost no column strength. That’s why aluminum MIG welding usually calls for a spool gun or push-pull setup rather than a standard 10-foot torch. Burnback: Wire Fused to the Contact TipBurnback is the tip welding itself to the wire. The classic cause is wire feed speed set too low for the voltage — the arc burns the wire back faster than the feeder replaces it, and the arc climbs into the tip. Other culprits: a contact tip recessed too far inside the nozzle, a tip that’s oversized for the wire (loose contact means arcing inside the bore), a poor ground that destabilizes the arc, or too little stickout so the tip sits in the heat. Tip geometry matters more than most welders realize. MillerWelds notes that the wrong size or a worn contact tip, plus incorrect contact-tip-to-nozzle recess, can cause excessive spatter on its own. Stubbing and Chattering: The Feed Path Fighting BackStubbing feels like the wire is poking the plate instead of arcing into it. Chattering is worse — you hear it before you see it. A chattering sound in the gun cable is a classic sign of a wire delivery problem in the liner or drive system: a worn or dirty liner, tip drag, a spool brake wound too tight, or drive roll pressure so high the wire deforms and drags through the liner. The Five-Minute Feed Setup Checklist
Quick Note: Most “my machine is broken” wire feed calls are consumable issues — a $6 tip, a $15 liner, or a drive roll turned the wrong way. Check the cheap parts before you load the machine into a truck. Contact Tip Life: Worn Versus Egged OutA worn tip has an enlarged but roughly round bore from normal arc erosion. An egged out tip has an oval, gouged hole, usually from burnback, a bent wire, or running the wrong diameter. Egged-out tips throw the arc off-center and produce wandering, spattery beads. Tip life depends on amperage, duty cycle, wire type, and whether you’re running flux-cored (shorter life) or aluminum (longer but fussier). Keep spares of the right size and check the bore against a fresh tip now and then. Poor feed also shows up as a rough, inconsistent bead that gets blamed on technique. If the wire isn’t arriving at a constant rate, the puddle can’t be consistent — and no amount of gun-angle fiddling will fix it. Gas, Polarity, and Consumables: The Setup Mistakes That Mimic Technique ProblemsWhen a bead starts acting up, most welders blame their hands. They change the travel angle, slow down, speed up, and get the same ugly result. The real problem is often upstream: wrong gas, reversed polarity, a ground through paint, or a contact tip that should have been replaced two spools ago. These errors produce defects that look exactly like bad technique, which is why people chase the wrong variable all evening. Shielding Gas: Read the Label, Then Read the FlowStart with cylinder identification. Mixed-gas cylinders are labeled with the exact composition, not just “MIG mix.” C25 is 75% argon and 25% CO2; C20 is 80/20. Grab the wrong cylinder and arc behavior changes immediately. Your supplier’s handling guide is worth reading once, and a reputable supplier such as AllGas Welding Supply explains cylinder labeling and safe handling clearly. A regulator and a flowmeter are not the same thing. The regulator drops cylinder pressure to a usable level; the flowmeter sets and indicates actual flow in cubic feet per hour (CFH). Ball-style flowmeters are most accurate mid-scale, which is why 15–30 CFH reads better than pinning the ball at either end. ESAB cites roughly 25–40 CFH as a typical MIG shielding gas flow range. In metric, 1 CFH is about 0.47 liters per minute, so 25–40 CFH is roughly 12–19 L/min. More gas is not better. Excessive flow creates turbulence at the nozzle that can aspirate shop air into the shielding stream, producing porosity even with a full cylinder. Check the hose connections, O-ring, valve, and a spatter-packed nozzle before touching the flow setting. Which Gas for Which Job
Gas mix |
Typical use |
What to expect |
C25 (75% argon / 25% CO2) |
Short-circuit MIG on mild steel |
Stable arc, good bead appearance, moderate penetration |
100% CO2 |
Short-circuit MIG on mild steel |
Hotter arc, deeper penetration, more spatter, lower cost |
Argon-rich mix with 1–5% O2 or CO2 |
Spray transfer on mild steel; some stainless |
Smooth spray arc, low spatter, high heat input |
98% argon / 2% CO2 or stainless tri-mix |
Stainless steel MIG |
Stable arc and corrosion resistance when matched to filler |
100% argon |
Aluminum MIG |
Required for aluminum; poor for steel short-circuit transfer |
Note: A $12 flowmeter and a $3 O-ring fix more welds than a $1,200 machine upgrade. Check the cheap setup layer first. Bead appearance |
Likely cause |
First fix |
High, convex crown |
Voltage low for WFS, travel too slow, crowding angle |
Raise voltage slightly, speed up, check gun angle |
Flat or concave with washed toes |
Voltage high, travel too fast |
Lower voltage, slow travel, inspect for undercut |
Ropey or stacked-coin |
WFS/voltage mismatch, inconsistent travel |
Reset baseline settings, steady the travel |
Wandering or wiggling |
Work angle, body position, wire cast, arc blow |
Reposition, shorten stickout, check ground |
Deep end crater |
No crater fill or abrupt termination |
Pause, add wire, use crater-fill if available |
Part hinges or bows |
Excess heat input, poor sequence |
Reduce heat, backstep, clamp or fixture |
Short Note: A bead can look perfect and still fail inspection, just as an ugly bead on a non-critical cosmetic joint can be structurally sound. Shape is a clue, not a verdict. Acceptance depends on the code, joint, loading, and inspector. Quick Note: A $10 notebook beats a $500 gadget for building diagnostic intuition. Log the symptom, the change, and the result, and within a month you’ll recognize patterns faster than any app can suggest them. Symptom |
Probable Cause |
Quick Check |
Corrective Action |
Porosity |
Lost shielding or contamination |
Flow reading, nozzle, base metal |
Restore gas coverage, grind clean |
Heavy spatter |
Bad ground or voltage/WFS mismatch |
Clamp contact, arc sound |
Clean ground, tune voltage |
Birdnesting |
Drive roll tension or liner |
Feed wire by hand, inspect liner |
Reset tension, replace liner |
Burnback |
WFS too low for voltage |
Tip condition, stickout |
Raise WFS, check tip recess |
Undercut |
Excess voltage or travel speed |
Bead profile at the toes |
Lower voltage, slow down |
Lack of fusion |
Too cold, travel too fast |
Bead wet-in, position settings |
Increase heat input, adjust angle |
Quick Note: If you can smell the puddle through your helmet, the plume is reaching you. Reposition the extraction hood; don’t weld faster. Note: Grinding a discontinuity smooth so it “looks better” doesn’t change what’s underneath. On load-bearing work, that’s cosmetically fixing an inspection result, not a weld.
NH
Nicholas HarperEditorial TeamCovering welding processes, equipment selection, and shop-floor practice for WeldZen — with every claim checked against the governing code. Related Studies
Technical Dispatch
Get The Next Benchmark FirstNew field studies and calibration sheets, once a week. No spam. |